Physical implementation

Selected block layouts

Five of six analog blocks reached block-level layout. Two representative layouts are shown here. Electrical results are labeled by evaluation method.

Bootstrapped switch block-level GPDK045 layout
SAMPLING SWITCH · GPDK045

Bootstrapped switch

Block-level layout of the bootstrapped sampling switch.

ANALOG CORE · GPDK045

Folded-cascode OTA

Block-level layout of the PMOS-input folded-cascode OTA for the 1.0 V design.

Folded-cascode OTA block-level GPDK045 layout

Simulation results

Targets and evaluation status

RequirementResultStatus and scope
SNDR ≥80 dB78.38 dBMissed by 1.62 dB in the noise-included behavioral model
ENOB ≥12 bit12.73 bitMet in the same behavioral evaluation
Power <50 µW≈46 µW partialFull-chip target remains unverified
FoM <100 fJ/step≈136 fJ/stepMissed even with partial power and behavioral ENOB
BEHAVIORAL · NOISE INCLUDED
78.38dB

calibrated behavioral model · 20 independent noise realizations

12.73 bitmean ENOB
78.05–78.81 dBnoise-realization range
1.62 dBbelow 80-dB target

The 78.38-dB mean is 1.62 dB below the 80-dB target. What varies across the 20 evaluations is the random noise realization. This is not a process or mismatch Monte Carlo sweep. Mean ENOB is 12.73 bit.

Model boundary. The paper specifies a calibrated sampled/OTA-noise model with simplified finite-gain leakage, but does not identify its feedback-DAC level mapping. The result is not verified for the schematic’s ±437.5 mV DAC range. A model/configuration artifact is needed to establish that relationship.

Noise-included behavioral output spectrum
Representative noise realization, seed 26: 78.34 dB SNDR and 12.72-bit ENOB. The 20-realization mean is 78.38 dB.
BEHAVIORAL REFERENCE · QUANTIZATION ONLY
83.5dB idealized behavioral peak · −2 dBFS

Behavioral SNDR sweep

This sweep isolates quantization-noise shaping at OSReff = 64. The 83.5-dB peak is a reference-model result, not the final performance claim.

Behavioral SNDR versus input amplitude
Behavioral SNDR versus input amplitude.
MODELED POWER SUBTOTAL
≈40 µW VDD-powered core
6.25 µW DAC ladders
≈46 µW partial estimate

The ≈40 µW comes from closed-loop schematic VDD current. The two externally powered DAC strings add 6.25 µW, calculated from the nominal ladder values. Combining an approximate core value with that nominal contribution supports ≈46 µW, not full-chip power.

Block figures are separate checks: OTA core ≈2.3 µW per OTA and resistive CMFB ≈0.5 µW per OTA. Do not add these again to the VDD subtotal. The paper does not provide a complete per-block reconciliation. On-chip bias/reference generation, buffers, pads/ESD, decimation, and layout parasitics remain outside the estimate.

CLOSED-LOOP SCHEMATIC

Transient behavior

The schematic transient run checks bounded loop behavior over a finite interval. The plots show the first-integrator node V1p and B0, one bit of the 3-bit quantizer output. B0 alone does not establish decoded multibit tracking or spectral performance.

  • V1p bounded7–27 µs detail stays around the common-mode operating region.
  • One quantizer bit shownB0 switching activity over 330 µs. The complete 3-bit output word is not plotted here.
  • No divergence observedIntegrator states remain bounded over the simulated interval.
Closed-loop transistor-level transient waveform

Verification scope

Behavioral models, schematic simulations, and block-level drawings are separate evidence domains.

Evaluated

Behavioral SNDR and ENOB. OTA DC/AC. Closed-loop schematic transient behavior. Block-level layout drawings.

Outside current scope

Fabricated silicon. Full-system PEX/post-layout performance. Mismatch Monte Carlo. Transistor-level spectral SNDR.

NEXT ENGINEERING ITERATION

Reconcile the DAC, then re-evaluate the loop

First establish the behavioral model’s DAC configuration, align the resistor-string levels and flash thresholds, and repeat dynamic characterization with that configuration recorded. The paper’s remaining work covers bias/reference integration, clock and settling optimization, parasitic extraction, mismatch analysis, and physical verification.

Project resources